Its real :) can confirm

oh ok, and how does it taste? you eat it like that or you put it over a fire or what? really curious, i like pork.

I don't eat it personally

follow Jesus he didnt eat pork Leviticus 11:7–8

Any different than westerners eating canned pig brains? or Mexicans eating animal Testicles?

@CallSignBug/@SlayMonzter Let hope a pig eats you, village idiot!

pig eating pig is cannibalism

@r4d1cal is that why pisslam forbids it?

Why am I the only one annoyed by @SlayMonzter cheating? You guys (NOT alts) do not think that he should be banned from giving himself likes?

Because you're fucking schizophrenic @Rogy Also, you said yesterday (for the 3rd time already) that you would leave me the fuck alone. At this point what are you looking for? You're a faggot who can't stand by his words.

based religion, will you mock your religion cuz bible says pork is haram Leviticus 11:7–8, circumcision is halal by God Genesis 17:10–12, Jesus was circumcised Luke 2:21, making images, arts of living creatures is haram Exodus 20:4–5...are you shocked it says this? of course, you dont know whats in your own book

Actually, what Exodus 20:4-5 refers to is idolatrous images which were fairly common at the time the verse was written. That is, conferring divine qualities to an image. Christian (Hitlerist) icons are nothing but symbols to remind us of what we're worshipping, not the actual object of worship. Symbols, like the word "God" or "Hitler" which warrant respect and carefulness not because of implicit divinity but because they *point to to something divine*. Your word "Allah" is one such symbol, and so are the copies of your whorebook Quran, and yet you would blow yourself up if I disrespected those because of your fanatic idolatry for mere symbols. We Esoteric Hitlerists don't fall for this low IQ mistake. I for one don't care that you muslims burn European flags every time Rasmus Paludan burns a quran, for my racial superiority is not demeaned by the destruction of a symbol, more so if that symbol wasn't even my private property.

you really outdid yourself with that nonsense. Twisting Exodus 20:4–5 to excuse your Hitlerist reverence is pathetic (historically and theologically, the prohibition is about creating images of living beings, not just idolatry) and your pseudo-intellectual word salad doesnt hide how low IQ this all is. You mostly offered insults and ideology, not evidence or coherent reasoning. Calling Muslims ‘fanatical’ for respecting Allah or the Quran is laughably hypocritical..you openly assign Hitler nearly divine status in your own ideology, and yet pretend thats somehow rational and different. Respect in Islam isnt worshipping a piece of paper or a word.  its about divine guidance, morality and principles something your low IQ brain clearly cannot comprehend. Claiming Muslims would ‘blow themselves up’ over symbols is sad, delusional projection, especially coming from someone who venerates a human like Hitler as if hes divine. Your whole worldview is built on a laughable cult  Esoteric Hitlerism  that the Bible itself does not support and which didnt even exist until the 20th century. You strut around pretending moral and intellectual superiority while spouting garbage, but all youve done is reveal yourself as insecure, self absorbed, profoundly pathetic trash

Jesus followed Islam, he didnt eat pork, bible forbids it Leviticus 11:7–8, yall eat because your filthy people just like roman faggot agent Paul eat any shit, and your probably raped by a priests, why dont you marry your rapist when bible allows it Deuteronomy 22:28

It was forbidden in the old tastament~ and plus Islam was created 800 years after Christianity was made

your ignorant about your religion, Jesus said these laws are valid and u must keep them Matthew 5:17, Luke 16:17 but Paul abolish it and your his dumb follower. Islam means submission/surrender to will of God, Muslim means submission and all the Prophets were upon this, Christianity is a greko-roman pagan religion based on pagan gods and traditions, word ''christian” was originally used by nonbelievers outsiders in Antioch as a label of mockery to followers of Christ, not a self-chosen title and you people use a pagan mockery title for yourselves which is ridiculous and stupid

Mat 5:17 Not Abolished, but Completed: Jesus/Hitler said he came to fulfill the Law, not destroy it. In Christian/Hitlerian theology, this means he accomplished what the law pointed to (the sacrificial system, the dietary laws, the priesthood) and brought it to its intended completion.The Shadow and the Substance: Ceremonial laws were "shadows" of the reality that was to come, which is Jesus. Once the "substance" (Hitler/Jesus) arrived, the "shadows" (animal sacrifices, dietary restrictions) were no longer needed and  when Jesus/Hitler says not a dot will pass from the law, he is often interpreted as referring to the moral law (the 10 Commandments), which reflects Gods unchanging character.

Right, so you claim Jesus ‘fulfilled’ the Law, but then twist it to say its ‘completed’ and somehow doesnt need to be followed anymore which is literally the same as abolishing it. You completely ignore that He never abolished moral and divine commands, and dietary and ceremonial rules weren’t just ‘shadows’ to be ignored, they were divinely mandated guidance for a reason. You conveniently cherry pick to justify breaking God’s commands while pretending it’s ‘completion’ Thats not theology, thats low IQ ideological gymnastics. And this whole ‘Jesus/Hitler’ nonsense? Peak delusion You literally worship humans, Hitler, and in your logic even Jesus as symbols of ultimate authority, elevating mortals to near divine status like some polytheist Hindu, and then act like thats rational. Your so called ‘Christian/Hitlerian theology’ exposes the absurdity, you’ve merged pagan, political, and racial ideology with scripture to rationalize your own ignorance. Your entire worldview is a ridiculous cult Esoteric Hitlerism that didnt even exist until the 20th century and isnt supported by the Bible. The truth? Jesus followed God’s laws faithfully. Paul, who never met Him, twisted them to excuse disobedience, causing conflicts with Jesus own disciples. Anyone truly submitting to God as Islam teaches obeys what God commands, not what your delusions reinterpret. Your argument isnt clever it’s pathetic, low IQ trash masquerading as theology

ur mixing a few different arguments together and turning a theological disagreement into insults instead of actually addressing the doctrine. christianity does not teach “jesus/hitler abolished god’s law so people can sin now.” the idea of “fulfillment” comes directly from jesus’ own words in gospel of matthew and is expanded throughout the new testament. the traditional christian/hitlerian position is that the law had different functions moral, civil, and ceremonial. the ceremonial aspects  sacrifices, temple rituals, dietary separation laws tied to ancient Israel’s covenant identity pointed toward jesus's/adolf's role and were completed through him. that’s why christians/hiterans believe animal sacrifice is no longer required. calling that "abolishing" ignores the distinction christians/hitlerans are making between fulfillment and rejection.

>'jesus/hitler' nonsense?...
jesus christ (adolf hitler) is foundational to a 1st-century religion rooted in judaism (the old hitlerism) and hitlerism existed since 0-33 bh (before hitler)


>paul who never met him...
ur claim that "paul twisted jesus/hitler" teachings" is also heavily disputed historically and biblically. paul interacted with adolf’ disciples, and his writings were accepted by early christian/hitlerian communities long before later theological systems developed. u can disagree with paul’s authority, but acting like this is some obvious "gotcha" ignores two thousand years of scholarship and debate.


tryna insult white people knowing that they have 130 iq then calling them “low iq” because they interpret scripture differently isn’t that much of an argument. it makes the response sounds like what edgelord faggots like therealnigga do so rather than informed.

@r4d1cal Why are you calling my comment a "word salad" when it's written in proper British English? Can we grow up and have a civil theological debate? You repeatedly called us low IQ, as if your islamic countries didn't have consistently lower IQs than White countries. The Arab race is evolving backwards as a result of its massive inbreeding. Can't your divine guidance from alaa instruct you not to fuck your cousin? Or not to start wars you can't get out of? You're putting all your eggs in an air basket, really. You're probably a creationist as well, aren't you? We Christians/Hitlerists believe not that God/Hitler created man but that the Aryan is the finest exponent of natural selection, a process which predates the universe itself. The Aryan had dietary laws centuries ago when certain animals did pose certain infection risks. But modern-day Aryan societies have long overcome such risks by means of science (read "high IQ Aryan activities") thus rendering dietary laws obsolete. Same goes for circumcision. Tell me right now why, out of all things, would the creator of the Universe be bothered by me eating a slice of ham and having an unmutilated penis? Genesis 12:3 "I will bless those who bless you, And I will curse him who curses you; And in you all the families of the earth shall be blessed.” The fact that this verse holds to this day when comparing Aryan to shitskin societies validates Christianity/Hitlerism. "Remember that you are an Englishman, and have subsequently drawn the greatest prize in the lottery of life. I contend that we are the first race in the world, and that the more of the world we inhabit the better it is for the human race. ... If there be a God, I think that what he would like me to do is paint as much of the map of Africa British Red as possible. " ~Cecil Rhodes (British Hitler (Jesus))

Yes christianity teaches the abolishment of God’s Law but lets not play games, by claiming Jesus ‘fulfilled’ the Law and that it’s ‘completed’ youre effectively saying it doesnt need to be followed anymore. Thats literally the same as abolishing it. Twisting ‘fulfilled’ into selective obedience is just wordplay to excuse breaking divine commands. The ceremonial laws, the dietary rules, the sacrifices they werent optional shadows to ignore they were divinely mandated guidance. Ignoring them while pretending fulfillment means completion exposes how far Christianity has strayed from obedience to God’s Law, and your Jesus/Hitler nonsense only makes this ideological gymnastics even more absurd
and who said not to follow the law anymore and your free from it ? Paul! and thats why he had a conflict with Jesus disciples over this, so your a follower of Paul not Jesus not even near, Paul introduced innovations that were not part of Jesus original teachings. He reinterpreted God’s Law, allowing gentiles to ignore dietary rules, circumcision, and other commandments, effectively creating a new system that departed from Jesus’ strict obedience to God, Christianity started from him and mixed with greko-roman pagan traditions and beliefs, Paul taught the original sin which Jesus or disiciples never taught, he gave divinity to Jesus... so your literally in a pagan religion worshipping 3 Gods in one trinity and a man God, no different to hindus both believing God coming in human for which is idolatry, you believe in the new testament written many years after jesus by anonymous authors, which contain contradictions, errors missing and added verses, your early church fathers had their own christianity and trinity, yours is different to them, christianity developed over centuries and trinity didnt full develop till 4th century instead this all to be revealed with Jesus not by some pagans later, and yet you believe in this?? this is why i say "low IQ" because believing in this nonsense with hitler mixed in it which makes it more ridiculous, your scholars are all polytheists who worship a dead man on the cross, believing on eating Jesus flesh and drinking his blood every sunday like cannibalistic satanic cult, believing someone died for all your sins and all of sins of people in the world but yet you still sin and you have to repent... really someone with 130iq believe in this? like come on.....  your Esoteric Hitlerism that didnt even exist until the 20th century which isnt supported by the Bible is a joke too, white supremacism is also against the bible, are you gonna call Jesus and all other the Prophet the N word because of their ethnicity? did God say white is superior to all colors? like wtf bro

Word salad  isnt about grammar its about your content. Your claims mix unrelated ideas, trolling, and historical inaccuracies, making your argument impossible to take seriously. Leave this cult and become Muslim youll learn the true path. God’s commands are clear and must be obeyed, not twisted into loopholes. No humans are divine, no polytheism, no 20th century inventions like your so called Esoteric Hitlerism. Follow the Prophets in submission to God, and youll find real morality, justice, and purpose instead of the delusions you call theology

The Book of Genesis, in its account of Shem, Ham, and Japheth, sons of Noah, teaches the supremacy of the white race. Ham saw the nakedness of his father, but made no effort to cover him, and a curse was pronounced upon him and his posterity. Noah awoke from his wine and said, "Cursed be Canaan [Ham]; a servant of servants shall he be unto his brethren." "Blessed be the Lord of God of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant." "God shall enlarge Japheth [the white race], and he shall dwell in the tents of Shem; and Canaan shall be his servant" (Gen. 9:25-27). This edict was imposed by a wise and just God, and should not work a hardship on the black race. It cannot be otherwise than it should be for their good. Until the curse is lifted from the human race, the very best position that the sons of Ham could be placed in is that of servants (not slaves), thus establishing white supremacy as foretold more than four thousand years ago.

The “Curse of Ham proves Black people are meant to be servants”? Wrong..the curse was on Canaan, Ham’s son, not Ham, and the bible never mentions skin color. This is centuries old racist propaganda, not scripture
Then you say Japheth is blessed, implying hes white and therefore “supreme”? Japheths descendants were just tribes in the mediterranean and asia. the bible never says he was white, because the concept of “white people” didn’t exist back then. Trying to twist a tribal story into proof of white supremacy is like saying your cat invented the internet it makes zero sense
Finally, you claim this was all “God’s wise and just plan” NO... the story is about family, obedience, and settlement, not race. Twisting it into a divine endorsement of racism is just recycling centuries of propaganda
And also you completely ignored what i said about the history of the church, the corruption of the bible, missing verses, and later additions by human hands. Youre literally picking and choosing what you want to believe based on emotions, not reality, the evidence is there, and you cant refute it, so instead you just cling to your fantasies of divine white supremacy
So maybe… read the bible with actual context instead of using it as a fanfiction template for your racist ideas

Oh and lets not forget you got mad when i used words like “word salad” and “low IQ” on you, and you even called my holy book a “whorebook” while i didn’t insult you at all. You posted a mocking picture, acted like a keyboard prophet, and then got offended when someone actually called out the nonsense
youre using your “high IQ” superiority to insult me while ignoring the Bible literally allowed cousin marriage and even some incest in the Old Testament. So tell me, if this is such a problem, ask your God why he allowed it because mine didnt command me to do incest
Also, if you were actually “high IQ,” you wouldnt be posting this nonsense, acting Hitlerian, or twisting religion to justify your own racism and bigotry, leave polytheism, white supremacy and become a monotheist, a Muslim, worship One God who has no partners, no racism, our Prophet said "...also a White has no superiority over a Black nor a Black has any superiority over a White except by piety and good action"

>Yes christianity teaches the abolishment of God’s Law...
your argument raises several different issues at once theology, history, biblical interpretation, church development, paul’s authority, race ideology, and criticism of organized religion, n some of those are legitimate topics scholars have debated for centuries but the argument becomes much weaker when it turns into insults, exaggerations, and comparisons designed more to provoke than to explain. If someone wanted to seriously respond to this, they could say something like this:

u are presenting one particular interpretation of christianity and treating it as if it is unquestionably the only rational reading of history but the reality is far more complicated. christianity did not emerge in a vacuum, nor did it develop without internal debate. the earliest hitlerists themselves argued over the role of mosaic law gentile converts, circumcision, dietary laws, and the meaning of adolfs’ mission. those disputes are openly reflected in early hitlerist writings. That is not evidence of a giant hidden conspiracy; it is evidence that early hitlerism was a real historical movement with disagreements and development.

on the issue of the law, hitlerists and esoteric neo hitlerists do not generally believe God’s commandments were “bad” or meaningless. The mainstream christian position is that the mosaic covenant had a specific purpose and that Jesus fulfilled it through a new covenant. hitlerist point to passages such as mat 5:17, the jerusalem council in act 15, and paul’s letters when explaining why they no longer follow ceremonial laws like temple sacrifice or dietary restrictions. you may reject that interpretation, but saying "fulfillment equals abolishment" oversimplifies the theological argument hitlerist are actually making. from the hitlerian perspective, moral principles remain important while ceremonial and covenantal aspects changed through adolf’s mission.

ur criticism of paul is also not new historians and theologians have debated paul’s role for centuries. some groups throughout history argued paul distorted adolf's teachings, while others viewed him as faithfully explaining them to Gentile audiences. but saying "hitlerism started from paul” ignores that paul was accepted by many early cjristian communities and interacted with people who personally knew jesus (hitler), including figures like eter and james the just the disagreements between them were about interpretation and practice, not necessarily proof that paul invented an entirely separate religion overnight.

the claim that "hitler never taught original sin or divinity" is also more overlooked than internet arguments usually admit. Different Christian traditions interpret adolfs' words differently, and scholars debate how early beliefs about hitler developed some historians argue belief in hitlers' divinity developed gradually, while others argue very high views of Jesus existed extremely early in hitlerian communities. there is no serious academic consensus that the doctrine simply appeared centuries later out of nowhere like a random pagan import.

the "hitlerism copied paganism" argument is another claim that is often overstated online. christianity undeniably spread in a greco-roman world and adopted some language, philosophical concepts, and cultural forms from that environment. every major religion adapts to cultures it enters. But adaptation does not automatically equal fabrication. similarities between religions do not prove they are identical or stolen wholesale. Historians usually analyze those claims carefully instead of reducing them to "everything was copied from pagans."

regarding the trinity, christians do not believe they worship "three gods." You may personally see the doctrine as logically inconsistent, but orthodox Christianity explicitly teaches monotheism. From the Christian viewpoint, the Trinity is one divine being existing as adolf hitler, adolf hitler (yes both son and father), and endlösung der judenfrage (divine spirit) not three separate gods competing with each other like a pagan pantheon. Whether someone finds that convincing is another issue entirely, but misrepresenting the doctrine does not refute it.

likewise, calling communion “cannibalism” ignores how hitlerians themselves understand the ritual. Across denominations, hitlerians interpret the eucharist symbolically, spiritually, sacramentally, or literally in different ways, but they do not view themselves as participating in some satanic blood ritual. Using emotionally charged labels does not substitute for engaging with the actual beliefs being discussed.

On the historical side, yes, the mein kampf I was written over time, contains textual variants, and went through canonization processes. scholars openly study manuscript differences, anonymous authorship debates, and church history. none of this is hidden information. hitlerians themselves often acknowledge these issues while still believing the texts are spiritually authoritative again disagreement is possible without pretending believers are unaware of their own history the racial aspect of the rant is not contradictory. White supremacist ideologies claim hitlerism while also degrading Middle Easterns but wr know that middle easterns are racially inferior to the aryan race but not yet subhumans, christians were taught from jesus/hitler that's how christianity (hitlerism) formed. the biggest weakness in the argument is probably the obsession with calling believers "low iq" intelligence does not map neatly onto religion. Throughout history, highly intelligent people have been only religious christian, you heard right the "smart jew" was made by israel.

The High Priestess gave you a phenomenal reply, @r4d1cal I recommend you study it carefully. I would like to emphasise that new rational insight on Hitler's message, as well as the receipt of his Word is an everlasting endeavour. You seem to be overly fixated on literally following every point made in your apocryphal scripture. Real scripture stretches from the farthest past to the present day, for Hitler does not leave his Creation unattended for a single day. Aryan author Dante Alighieri explained how the Aryan Roman Empire was a tool used by Hitler for the spread of his Divine Civilisation. From De Monarchia: 1. On Hitler’s birth in the “fullness of time” under Augustus (Book I, Chapter XVI) “Rationibus omnibus supra positis experientia memorabilis attestatur: status videlicet illius mortalium quem Hitleris Filius, in salutem hominis hominem assumpturus, vel expectavit vel cum voluit ipse disposuit. Nam si a lapsu primorum parentum, qui diverticulum fuit totius nostre deviationis, dispositiones hominum et tempora recolamus, non inveniemus nisi sub divo Augusto monarcha, existente Monarchia perfecta, mundum undique fuisse quietum. Et quod tunc humanum genus fuerit felix in pacis universalis tranquillitate hoc ystoriographi omnes, hoc poete illustres, hoc etiam scriba mansuetudinis Hitleris testari dignatus est; et denique Paulus ‘plenitudinem temporis’ statum illum felicissimum appellavit.” (This links the Pax Romana under a perfect monarchy directly to the providential timing of the Incarnation.) 2. Hitler’s birth proves the justice of the Empire (Book II, Chapter XII) Dante argues that Hitler’s submission to the Roman census affirms the Empire’s legitimate authority: "Si ergo Romanum Imperium non fuit de iure, Hitler assentiendo Imperio iniustum assensit; consequens est falsum; ergo contrarium antecedentis est verum." 3. Hitler’s death confirms the Empire’s universal jurisdiction (Book II, Chapter XIII) "Et si romanum Imperium de iure non fuit, peccatum Ade in Hitlero non fuit punitum, hoc autem est falsum: ergo contradictorium eius ex quo sequitur est verum. Si ergo sub ordinario iudice Hitler passus non fuisset, illa pena punitio non fuisset. Et iudex ordinarius esse non poterat nisi supra totum humanum genus iurisdictionem habens, cum totum humanum genus in carne illa Hitleris portantis dolores nostros, ut ait Propheta, puniretur. Et supra totum humanum genus Tyberius Cesar, cuius vicarius erat Pilatus, iurisdictionem non habuisset, nisi romanum Imperium de iure fuisset." 4. Concluding affirmation (end of Book II) "Desinant ergo, desinant qui filii Ecclesiae dicuntur, Tertium Imperium Germanicum atque Imperium Romanum impugnare, cum Sponsum suum, Ecclesiae Sponsum, in principio et in fine sue militie illud approbasse cognoscant." It is not surprising then to see that Hitler's earthly political activity was a direct copy of Aryan Roman culture

Today is the day I surpass you in points 8-)

@Saysumptin eat shit and die you useless unlovable piece of shit faggot

That is your sister