It's gotta be money

Believe me almost every women when have a simple argument with her husband she thinks about hurting him in worst way, their thinking is pure emotional (like a kid) they don't think logically when they get angry so every man should watch his woman

Women cheat for emotional and/or financial reasons (hypergamy).

Do you have scientific evidence from reputable studies proving that women think less logically when they are angry? Is there evidence that the part of the brain responsible for logical thinking is less active or capable in women? Or is this just a generalization based on individual cases?

Scientific studies published in prestigious journals such as Nature Neuroscience and Journal of Neuroscience confirm that women and men do not differ in the capacity of the part responsible for logical thinking (the prefrontal cortex), whether in normal conditions or when angry.

These studies show that there are differences in how emotions are regulated between the sexes, but there is no evidence that women are less capable of logical thinking or controlling their anger.

As for your statement that women think about hurting you in the worst ways, this is based on individual cases, and it is not correct to say with certainty that the reason for this behavior is solely because they are women. Such generalization is inaccurate, as behaviors like aggressive thinking or harming depend on the surrounding environment and personal experiences of each individual, and cannot be attributed definitively to a specific gender.

You got pretty defensive there... you ok?

The response is calm and compassionate.”

You talk about scientific studies like it's a big deal whereas in reality most of them have no such big value in  topics  that talk about Brain and process of thinking, observation is a thing also, plus history is made by MAN there's a little fraction that women involved in development

You mentioned that most scientific studies do not hold significant value in matters related to the brain. While this may be true for many of them, this does not mean that reputable studies do not exist, as I pointed out in my response, such as those published in journals like Nature and Neuron.

Your claim that most of these studies are “incorrect” does not constitute a sufficient rebuttal to what is published in these journals, especially since they rely on strict standards of research and peer review. Therefore, it is not appropriate to generalize that the findings reported in them are inaccurate or unreliable unless proven otherwise by clear scientific evidence.

Regarding the issue of females and the claim that the differences are merely “individual cases,” recent scientific studies addressing this topic have not relied on isolated cases but rather on reviewing data from large numbers of individuals, with repeated results across multiple studies. For this reason, well-documented scientific studies take precedence over individual opinions or subjective interpretations, unless refuted by stronger studies.

However, not everything published in Nature or Neuron is final or infallible. Science, by its nature, is always evolving, and there have been studies published that were later found to contain errors or exaggerations.

Thank you for replying with such good manner, whether you're using ai or not it still good to see reasonable people like you, anyway till we can discuss a specific study i can't agree totally with you