Truly I saw bible condemning even cishet relationships you dumfucks are ignorant, narcissistic, evil, rapist, terrorist, right winged, authotarian, nazi, fascists even they are forced into prisons in my country
In the bible you christain braindead pests wrote and corrupted is
Leviticus 18:22: "You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination."
Leviticus 20:13: "If a man lies with a male as with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination; they shall surely be put to death; their blood is upon
Genesis 19:5-11: The account of Sodom and Gomorrah, where a mob of men demands Lot to bring out two male visitors "that we may know them"
Judges 19:22: A similar story set in Gibeah involving a mob threatening sexual violence against a male visitor.
New Testament
Romans 1:26-27: "For this reason God gave them up to dishonorable passions. For their women exchanged natural relations for those that are contrary to nature; and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another..."
1 Corinthians 6:9-10: "...Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God."
These are all corrupted since after war most people didn't have men in their towns to mate with Dumfucks they changed it you evil, hateful, vitriolic, nazi, skinhead, 1488 my shoe go eat my ass for you may do something good with your mouth instead of speaking retarded shits
1. Leviticus 18:22 & 20:13 — “male as with a woman”
Traditional reading: A blanket ban on male homosexual sex.
Alternative arguments:
The Hebrew phrase “lying with a male as with a woman” is debated. Some scholars argue it describes a specific ancient sexual act tied to male hierarchy, domination, or violating social roles, not the modern concept of a loving same-sex relationship.
The laws are part of the Holiness Code, which includes many ritual/cultural purity rules (dietary laws, clothing mixtures, farming rules, etc.). Some argue these rules were aimed at maintaining Israelite identity in an ancient Near Eastern context rather than being universal moral laws.
The death penalty in Leviticus 20:13 is rarely applied by modern believers, which raises questions about why this specific law would be treated as permanently binding while other punishments are not.
2. Sodom and Gomorrah (Genesis 19)
Traditional reading: Sodom was destroyed because of homosexuality.
Alternative arguments:
The actual story describes a mob attempting sexual violence and humiliation, not a consensual relationship.
Book of Ezekiel 16:49 lists Sodom’s sins as pride, excess, neglect of the poor, and injustice not explicitly same-sex relationships.
The parallel story in Book of Judges 19 also involves a mob attempting rape, suggesting the theme is violence and abuse.
3. Romans 1:26–27
Traditional reading: Paul condemns homosexuality.
Alternative arguments:
Paul is discussing people who “exchanged” what was natural in the context of idolatry, especially Roman pagan practices.
Some scholars argue Paul was addressing behaviors common in his time: exploitation, excess, prostitution, pederasty, or status-based sexual relationships — not the modern idea of two consenting adults in a committed relationship.
The phrase “against nature” (para physin) can mean “outside the expected order” in a cultural sense, not necessarily a scientific claim about biology.
4. 1 Corinthians 6:9–10
Traditional reading: “Men who practice homosexuality” are condemned.
Alternative arguments:
The original Greek words are malakoi and arsenokoitai, and their exact meanings are debated.
Malakoi literally means “soft” and was used in different ways (including moral weakness or sexual exploitation).
Arsenokoitai is rare and may refer to specific abusive sexual practices rather than all same-sex relationships.
Some translations choose “homosexuals,” but that word did not exist in ancient Greek and may import a modern concept into the text.
5. Historical/cultural argument
A major argument is that ancient societies did not have the same categories we use today:
They often viewed sex through status, dominance, reproduction, and social roles.
The modern concept of sexual orientation (gay/straight as an identity) developed much later.
So some scholars argue the Bible’s condemnations target certain acts or contexts, not an entire group of people.
The strongest “disproof” argument is usually not “the Bible never mentions same-sex acts” (because it does), but rather:
These passages are about specific ancient practices and social systems, and applying them directly to modern consensual same-sex relationships may be a historical and linguistic mistake.
You guys are just ignorant fuckhead retarded troll slut whore feminist hateful rapist homophobic transphobic antifa bitchs etc, I saw jesus himself being a faggot. Jesus himself is a gay you idiot i saw him giving sucking to boys in bethelem he's a faggot who cannot stand other people expressing himself so he decided to become closeted of his true identity & role in this world to fund tax money for julius ceaser, he deserves to go in hell and burn in molten gold with the devil wholl also have fun gay sex BDSM rape with bandage rape toys
